|
April 12, 2009
Mark Smith, Editor
The column stated:
Internet smears hurt horses By Gina B. Good
The Internet is a powerful communications tool, but it's also no secret that malicious postings can ruin businesses as well as lives.
However, in Diane Davis's case, it was an innocent posting on Craigslist by a part-time volunteer that started her troubles.
The woman said Dream Chaser needed donations of supplies like halters, lead ropes and feed.
"That lead some people to assume we couldn't feed our horses," said Davis. Apparently, Jill Curtis of Shiloh Horse Rescue in Sandy Valley, was one of those people.
On Feb. 12, Curtis visited Dream Chaser to transport a number of horses who needed advanced treatment to Shiloh. "Jill has more resources than we do," explained Davis. "Shiloh is in Clark County, which gives Jill access to numerous veterinarians. She also does business across the state line. She told me she gets X-rays for free in California.
"Our horse, Tenacity, had unexplained weakness in one leg," said Davis. "How do you help a horse when you don't know what's wrong with it? Jill told me she works with a veterinarian school. I thought maybe we could get Tenacity more help if we gave her to Shiloh."
The second horse given to Shiloh, named Brandy, needed work on her feet but was too weak to stand on three legs while the work was done. According to Davis, Curtis had the equipment available to address the situation. Davis released a total of five horses who needed specialized help.
But the same day Curtis blasted Dream Chasers on her Web site's blog, saying they were not able to pick up the horses they had most wanted to help.
Curtis wrote, "We begged, pleaded, and even offered to buy both Blaze and Charlie Brown ... but we could not save them. It was a horrible day for all of us who went to help the horses.
"The condition of these horses is inexcusable and something has got to be done as some of them will not live long if things do not change. We heard every excuse in the book today about why the horses are all so thin and in such bad shape."
That dire prediction has been proved false.
More than a month and a half later, the horses are alive and well taken care of, according to veterinarian Gerald Hensler's examination just six days later. Davis readily acknowledges that both horses are thin. Charlie Brown is more than 30 years old, has a heart murmur and no teeth but is slowly filling out on a gruel diet augmented by corn oil.
Blaze is nine and on a senior diet. He is a cribber, meaning he chews on his fencing, causing gas to form in his stomach. According to Davis, many horses who are starved crib because when gas fills their stomach, they aren't as hungry.
She said it's a hard habit to break, but Davis and her volunteers watch Blaze carefully to assure he eats. Blaze was starved before Davis rescued him.
Since Feb. 12, Curtis has relentlessly mentioned how much better the "Fab Five." as she calls the horses from Dream Chaser, are doing at Shiloh.
In fact, two weeks after the five horses were brought to Shiloh, Curtis posted photographs showing remarkable progress. Their ribs were no longer showing and their coats had improved.
In fact, there is another theory why the horses look so much healthier in such a short time.
Earlier in March, Pahrump Valley Times photographer Horace Langford Jr. noticed that some photographs of the horses shown on Shiloh's Web site appear to have been retouched.
Specifically, Langford said some of the horses from Dream Chaser that Curtis claimed made such progress during their first two weeks at her facility looked as if they were "badly Photoshopped by an amateur." Langford said there are obvious differences in pixilation.
A second opinion was obtained by sending a link to Shiloh's Web site to Debbie Feldman Jones, a graphic designer in Baltimore, Md. She was asked to look at the Fab Five's before and after pictures.
Jones agreed with Langford's assessment. She said, "It appears that in Sweetie's after pictures, the white, gray patches from the before photo are an unnaturally strong shade of reddish brown."
She also said the after images "have more dense color, which is something that can be modified in Photoshop and added, "If the richer color is smoothed out while the rest show clear pixels, then I will say with certainty that the photos have been retouched."
The photos on Shiloh's Web site look as though the rib area of the horses have been smoothed over, making them look healthier.
The horses in question:
|
|
|
|
